Analysis of Jacoby

Katie Rupp
6/7/2007
Analysis of “Bring Back Flogging”

Jeff Jacoby’s title, “Bring Back Flogging,” grabs the reader’s attention. It is such an intriguing title, it really interests the reader. Jacoby and the title are not sympathetic or apologetic.
Jacoby’s thesis is plainly stated. From the title to the end of the third paragraph Jacoby is clear. Jacoby would like to bring back a few of the Puritans disciplinary styles, particularly flogging.
Jacoby method of argument begins with the four examples of Puritan justice. Although Jacoby admits that a few are ridiculous, he does agree with public flogging for non-violent criminals. Jacoby uses numerous statistics and quotes. Jacoby uses these statistics and quotes to convince the reader flogging would be quicker, cheaper, and more effective than locking up criminals.
Jacobys persona seems well educated and prepared. This essay is to the point, backed up with real evidence, Jacoby did his homework.
Jacoby’s closing paragraph ends the essay with stating that maybe Puritans were more enlightened than we think. Jacoby tries one last time to persuade by defending the “degrading “and “brutal” punishments by proclaiming, “but they’re quick and cheap.”
I believe Jacoby has valid points. Maybe flogging would detour a youth from robbing again. Jacoby uses good statistics about prisons. Violent offenders are getting out only because there isn’t enough room. I thought Jacoby had a well thought out essay, he did a good job persuading. It made me stop and think about it.